AI interviews are often considered controversial. Many people associate them with a lack of human interaction or reduced trust.
However, a recent U.S. study shows a completely different picture:
The majority of candidates prefer AI interviews—when given the choice.
So what’s behind this?
A large-scale field experiment by the University of Chicago (Chicago Booth) examined the use of AI interviews in real hiring processes.
👉 Key result: 78% of candidates actively chose AI interviews instead of speaking with a recruiter.
The study clearly shows: AI interviews are not chosen randomly—they offer concrete advantages.
Many candidates perceive traditional interviews as stressful.
AI interviews, on the other hand, are perceived as:
👉 This leads to a better candidate experience—especially for younger or international talent.
A key advantage of AI interviews:
👉 As a result, many candidates perceive AI interviews as fairer than human interviews.
AI interviews often offer:
👉 Candidates have more control over their interview situation.
In addition to high acceptance, the data also shows clear performance benefits:
👉 This means: AI interviews are not only popular—they also deliver better results.
Many discussions about AI interviews are based on surveys, which often show skepticism.
However, the study makes one thing clear:
👉 What people say differs from what they actually do.
AI interviews are accepted when they are well designed.
Important factors include:
👉 Technology alone is not enough—
what matters is the user experience of AI interviews.
Key takeaways from the study:
👉 AI interviews are not just a trend—they are becoming a new standard in recruiting.
At lizzyAI, this is exactly where we focus:
👉 Our goal:To design AI interviews that candidates not only accept—but actively prefer.